ERP-01 Energy and Natural Resources
Energy and natural
resources are the life blood of manufacturing. Manufacturers need adequate,
secure and affordable energy and raw materials to compete in the global
marketplace. The NAM
supports appropriate government policies, including the development of a
national energy policy that would provide a climate conducive to exploration,
development and efficient utilization of all domestic energy resources and
would encourage development of public lands in a manner consistent with sound
environmental management. Reducing America 's dependence on
non-domestic energy and natural resources is prudent and desirable. The NAM supports an
“all-of-the-above” approach to energy, including recognition of the importance
of energy efficiency to meeting future energy demands.
Manufacturers use a significant amount of the
energy in this country and have long recognized the importance of energy
efficiency to their operations. Providing additional energy to support a
desired growth in manufacturing will require large capital investments by the
private sector. The ability of the energy-producing and energy-consuming
segments of industry to obtain adequate funding for energy-related investments
must not be impaired by government policies. Government should not be in the
business of picking winners and losers. The NAM will identify and oppose overly
restrictive regulations and the implementation of policies that limit or
eliminate energy sources and production.
The NAM supports significant
investments to modernize the national utility grid and utilize smart metering,
distributed storage and other advanced technologies to improve efficiency,
affordability, reliability and security.
The NAM is committed to protecting the
environment and to environmental sustainability. The NAM supports government policies
that promote innovation and recognize that technological advances over time
have reduced the environmental impacts of energy production and consumption.
Moreover, the NAM encourages policies that recognize these technological
advances, allow for a proper balance between economic growth and the protection
of our environment, and take into account future challenges, including those
posed by climate change.
Our nation's domestic oil and natural gas supply
represents an important factor in our energy future. In today’s global economy,
U.S.
manufacturers must be assured of an adequate supply of competitively priced oil
and natural gas for industrial and commercial use, such as petrochemical
feed-stocks, process gas uses and transportation fuels, and for power and steam
generation.
1.01a. Liquefied Natural Gas
The dramatic increase in the domestic natural
gas resource base has reduced the likelihood of the need for significant
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) imports. Some now believe the U.S. could
eventually become a net exporter of natural gas. An adequate supply of natural
gas is needed to meet the growing demand of the U.S. manufacturing sector in a recovering
economy. The NAM
strongly supports federal and state policies to accommodate growth in domestic
natural gas production. We further believe abundant domestic natural gas
resources can fuel a renaissance in U.S. manufacturing. The NAM
fundamentally supports free trade and open markets. We support a natural gas
policy process that is open, transparent and objective.
Oil There are abundant oil and natural gas
resources in the United
States . Domestic demand for energy resources
continues to increase. For manufacturers, a balance between supply and demand
is important to assure competitive, stable prices. The NAM supports
policies that promote the leasing, exploration and development of the nation's
oil and natural gas resources in an environmentally sound manner. Exploration
and development of promising areas onshore, offshore and in the Arctic can substantially lower our nation's energy
vulnerability with minimal environmental impact. The emergence of hydraulic
fracturing technologies has made the extraction of shale gas and shale oil more
technically feasible and more cost-effective. The development of Canadian oil
sand and shale gas resources is also providing increasingly important sources
of energy for American manufacturers and consumers. These new sources of gas
and oil will have a significant positive impact on this country’s ability to
meet its feedstock and energy needs.
As is currently the case for states with onshore
production from federal lands, and for Gulf Coast states with production from
federal waters off their coasts, all states with federal offshore leasing and
production should share in related federal revenues.
The refining industry is one of America ’s
largest manufacturing sectors, and refined petroleum products play a critical
role in meeting domestic transportation fuel demands. U.S. refineries
process crude oil into products such as gasoline, distillate and jet fuels,
heating oil and chemicals for domestic use and for export into world markets. U.S. refiners
have responded to the call for a cleaner environment by producing cleaner
fuels, such as reformulated gasoline, at competitive prices. Uninterrupted
production of these products and the transportation infrastructure necessary to
deliver them are essential to our national energy and economic security as well
as to U.S.
industry's ability to compete globally.
Industry relies on natural gas for much of its
energy needs and as a raw material. The NAM believes policies that
encourage the cost-effective use of natural gas to grow American manufacturing
should be encouraged.
The U.S. economy relies on natural gas
for much of its energy needs and as a feedstock for commercial products.
Natural gas is and will remain an important manufacturing commodity because of
its scalability, affordability, versatility and efficiency. The NAM supports
policies at the federal and state level that facilitate the responsible and
expeditious development of natural gas resources, allowing these benefits to
contribute to America’s economic recovery and to accrue for energy consumers.
Coal is the most abundant energy resource in the
United States
and is a vital part of our efforts to meet our energy and transportation needs.
The NAM
believes increasing the utilization of advanced clean coal utility and
industrial generation technology as well as expanding coal-to-gas and
coal-to-liquid technologies in an environmentally sound manner is an
appropriate and desirable national policy. Coal generates a significant
percentage of our nation's electricity, and maintaining coal in a diverse
national energy portfolio is in the national economic interest. Government
actions that unreasonably increase the cost of production and use of coal for
limited environmental or health benefits are counterproductive. Laws and
regulations governing air, water and solid waste quality are currently the most
crucial restraint on the use of coal by industry and utilities. Environmental
policies should be reviewed and applied in a manner that balances reasonable
environmental objectives with the need to have a diverse fuel portfolio,
including continued cost-effective coal use.
The NAM supports policies that promote
the leasing, exploration and development of the nation's coal resources in an
environmentally sound manner. These are national resources on public lands, and
they are vital to this country’s economic growth. The NAM opposes
efforts to unnecessarily restrict access to these national resources. Coal
leasing programs, which have historically been sporadic, have limited the
potential mining of billions of tons of coal that lie beneath federal lands. A
long-term, stable and flexible leasing policy should be maintained to ensure
the availability of federal coal reserves to contribute to our nation's energy
needs. The NAM
therefore supports streamlining and expediting coal leasing under the Federal
Coal Leasing Amendments Act.
The NAM supports continuing research,
development and demonstration of carbon capture, beneficial use and storage
(CCUS) technology. The NAM
also supports expeditious research, development and demonstration of carbon
capture use or storage (CCS) technology. (See ERP-02 1.13 for NAM climate
change principles.)
A free market energy policy is the best way of
encouraging economically sustainable alternative energy options. Government can
play a positive role in support of the research and development of alternative
energy sources. The NAM
opposes federal government mandates for use of alternative energy sources.
Policies that mandate the commercial use of non-traditional energy sources
before they are economically competitive are inefficient and impose unnecessary
costs on our society.
The NAM supports policies that
encourage an energy mix comprised of renewable energy resources and other power
options and allows energy efficiency measures but does not support mandating
specific technologies or portfolio standards. Clean and renewable energy
resources such as wind, solar, geothermal, hydro, landfill gas, municipal solid
waste (excluding paper which is commonly recycled) and sustainable biomass
provide alternatives to traditional fossil fuels. Together these resources
account for a steadily rising share of U.S. energy supply and development.
The NAM
encourages Congress to review clean and renewable energy resources to ensure
that policies avoid potential adverse impacts on users of renewable feed
stocks, agricultural and forest resources. These incentives should not create
winners and losers in the quest for developing renewable fuels. In establishing
federal renewable energy policies, the NAM encourages Congress to
recognize regional differences in renewable energy resource availability, and
to not conflict with or pre-empt state programs already enacted. Development
and utilization of non-traditional fuels and technologies will enhance energy
flexibility and expand diversification of energy supplies.
The NAM supports a transparent,
streamlined and timely federal permitting process for interstate electric
transmission infrastructure. Cost-effective investments in transmission
infrastructure to improve the reliability, capacity, efficiency and security of
the electric grid promote a competitive wholesale electricity market which
benefits residential, commercial and industrial rate-payers.
1.05. Demand-Side Management (DSM)
Programs, Energy Effciency Measures and Distributed Generation Resources
The NAM believes that the provision of
cost-effective DSM services by individual customers and aggregators’ programs,
energy efficiency measures, and distributed generation resources can help
ensure a reliable and adequate electricity supply at a lesser cost. Investments
in and opportunities for technologies and measures that enable customers and
aggregators to provide such services should not be precluded. The NAM also
believes that electric and natural gas utilities should not be precluded from
meeting future electricity and natural gas needs with these technologies and
measures. Utilities also must not be precluded from recovering prudently
incurred costs when implementing these programs, measures and services, and
non-discriminatory market opportunities for DSM services.
1.06. Hydroelectric Power
Hydropower is a renewable resource that cannot
easily be replaced. It does not deplete the nation's other fuel resources and
contributes to U.S.
energy self-sufficiency. Although hydro contributes a relatively small
percentage of the nation's energy supply, it is a significant percentage of the
renewable energy supply. It is energy efficient, with energy conversion
efficiency in the range of 85-95 percent. The NAM supports the continued use and
development of hydropower resources.
The NAM supports the streamlining of
the regulatory process for hydroelectric power development through the
elimination of redundant or contradictory regulatory steps and avoiding the
imposition of conflicting clauses in other legislative initiatives such as
those related to clean air, clean water and endangered species.
With regard to hydro projects owned and operated
by the federal government itself, efforts to offset their impact on fish and
wildlife (including Endangered Species Act initiatives) must be carefully
balanced with the preservation of economic, recreational and public safety
goals.
Nuclear power is a safe and vital source of
cost-effective base-load electricity that does not emit criteria pollutants or
greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. It is the largest source of non-emitting
power generation in the United
States and the second largest source of
electricity, supplying approximately 20 percent of the nation's power. The NAM supports
the continued development and operation of nuclear energy consistent with the
protection of public health and safety.
Nuclear energy helps stabilize the price of
electricity while maintaining a diversity of domestic fuel sources. As the
demand for electricity in the U.S.
continues to grow, the NAM
supports the construction of additional nuclear power plants that have been
approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to maintain a diverse portfolio
of generating resources. The NAM
also supports advanced nuclear technology for use in manufacturing as a source
of carbon-free process heat.
In supporting the continued use and development
of nuclear energy in the United States, the NAM supports the construction and
operation of facilities covering all parts of the fuel cycle and nuclear energy
generation, including power plants, fuel enrichment facilities, fuel
fabrication plants, low-level and high-level waste handling and disposal
operations, and other related facilities critical to supporting and expanding
the nuclear energy industry.
The NAM supports policies that allow
the federal government to fulfill its legal obligation to remove used fuel from
commercial nuclear power plants and manage its long term disposal. We support
the research, development and demonstration of technologies to close the fuel
cycle while a permanent disposal facility, which is needed even if the fuel
cycle is successfully closed, is developed. The NAM encourages the development of
interim storage facilities for consolidating used fuel until recycling or
permanent disposal facilities, or both, are available.
1.08. Energy Efficiency
Manufacturers are committed to reducing our
energy intensity and producing more energy efficient consumer products to help
reduce the U.S.
demand for energy, save money, lower costs and lessen greenhouse gas emissions.
American society has much to gain from sensible efficiency and waste reduction
measures across all sectors of the economy.
1.08.a Industrial Energy Effciency
Manufacturers use one-third of our nation’s
energy and are directly affected by the cost of energy in making products as
well as by the cost of maintaining office operations. It is widely acknowledged
that process and building system energy efficiency and conservation offer
immediate and cost-effective opportunities to reduce energy cost inputs, reduce
water use, stretch available energy supplies and decrease greenhouse gas
emissions.
Manufacturers have taken the lead in making
energy efficiency a priority. Improvements in energy efficiency in the
manufacturing sector have helped the country to be more efficient in energy use
per unit of GDP and reduced the energy intensity of the U.S. economy.
Manufacturers have achieved greater energy efficiency through cost-effective
distributed generation, combined heat and power technologies, waste heat
recovery systems, water reuse and recycling, intelligent energy systems such as
advanced metering infrastructure and demand response, and improved process
manufacturing.
The most significant federal actions to increase
industrial energy efficiency in the long run are those that will create a
positive climate for capital investment and energy services investment for new
and existing plants and equipment.
The NAM supports the use of favorable
capital cost recovery tax policies including first year expensing (see TDEP-01
1.02a) for capital investment.
There is an important federal role to be played
in basic research and development of new high-risk energy efficiency and waste
minimization technologies in energy intensive industries, particularly where
private sector incentives maybe inadequate.
There is also a clear federal role for
supporting and incentivizing small and medium businesses in the use of proven
energy management technologies, practices and services.
The NAM believes that previous overly
prescriptive federal energy policies have failed in large part because
cost-effective industrial energy efficiency improvements cannot be mandated.
Industrial energy management is a complex moving target that includes process
innovation, long-term quality planning, energy assessments of building and
equipment purchases, linkage of water and energy efforts, employee awareness,
and waste minimization and recovery.
The NAM supports voluntary industry and
market-driven benchmarking of industrial facilities and processes for the
purposes of raising the level of awareness of best-in-class energy management
possibilities. The NAM
opposes the imposition of mandatory data collection programs unless there is a
clear justification of the need for the data, as well as complete protection of
proprietary data. The federal role should be limited to supporting industry in
the development of voluntary information exchanges.
The NAM also opposes the imposition of
mandatory industrial energy efficiency targets. Federal energy efficiency
targets would have no meaning to most companies because manufacturing energy
consumption varies dramatically from plant to plant. Product demand, weather,
water availability, fuel price swings and capital investments, such as
pollution control technology, influence manufacturing energy consumption.
The NAM supports federal programs that
encourage and help manufacturers, especially small and medium-sized
manufacturers, to understand and deploy energy efficiency and energy management
measures for the purposes of becoming more competitive in a global marketplace.
Manufacturers Manufacturers play a significant
role in improving the efficiency of commercial and residential buildings. Since
the building sector consumes approximately 40 percent of all energy used in the
United States , the NAM supports
market, regulatory and institutional reforms that increase opportunities to
better utilize energy efficiency in buildings. Improving building efficiency
should start in the federal government, which is the largest owner of building
inventory in the country. The NAM
supports policies to enhance private sector investment in public building
efficiency improvement projects, as well as policies that strengthen standards
for existing commercial, industrial and residential buildings.
In addition, since residential and commercial
building improvements are often generated by obsolete infrastructure and
involve large capital expenditures, the NAM supports providing favorable
capital cost recovery tax policies, including first year expensing. (See
TDEP-01 1.02a.)
Finally, the role of cooperative
government-industry initiatives will be crucial in developing innovations that
transform current construction and retrofit methods into an approach that fully
integrates energy efficiency. As such, the NAM supports public-private efforts
to engage the building industry and promote the development of a workforce that
will shape the next generation of commercial and residential buildings.
Hand-in-hand with this is the development of techniques to maintain efficiency
through the lifespan of buildings, including energy audit systems and
techniques and best practice-sharing of both.
The NAM and our member companies are
committed to protecting the environment through greater environmental
sustainability, increased energy efficiency and conservation and reducing
greenhouse gas emissions believed to be associated with global climate change.
We know the U.S.
cannot solve the climate change issue alone. The establishment of federal
climate change policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, whether legislative
or regulatory, must be done in a thoughtful, deliberative and transparent
process that ensures a competitive level playing field for U.S. companies in
the global marketplace.
Therefore, the NAM
opposes any federal or state government actions regarding climate change that
could adversely affect the international competitiveness of the U.S.
marketplace economy. Any climate change policies should focus on cost-effective
reductions, be implemented in concert with all major emitting nations, and take
into account all greenhouse sources and sinks. The NAM believes that federal climate
policies generally should pre-empt state policies.
No comments:
Post a Comment